One small step from "what is." One giant heap of "what could be."



Things to come…that came and went

To say H.G. Wells didn’t like Fritz Lang’s “Metropolis” would be criminal understatement! Alan and Paul discuss Wells’s cinematic response to Lang: “Things to Come” (1936).

The genesis of “Things to Come” starts with HG Wells’s less-than-charitable review of Metropolis:

Originality there is none. Independent thought, none….

The word Metropolis, says the advertisement in English, “is in itself symbolic of greatness”‘- which only shows us how wise it is to consult a dictionary before making assertions about the meaning of words.1

Harsh words! Listen in for more as Alan and Paul discuss Wells and his alternate vision of the future.

  1. H. G. Wells on “Metropolis” (1927) ↩︎

Leave a comment